<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ranking-News.de &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ranking-news.de/category/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ranking-news.de</link>
	<description>Ein Dies und Das, Webmarketing &#38; SEO Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:29:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts vs Bing auf Twitter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ranking-news.de/2009/06/matt-cutts-vs-bing-auf-twittercom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ranking-news.de/2009/06/matt-cutts-vs-bing-auf-twittercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Die großen Herren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ranking-news.de/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eine interessante Conversation zwischen Matt Cutts und einer Mitarbeiterin von Bing.com auf Twitter. Matt Cutts googled sich selber und zeigt in seinen Tweets spammige und unzureichende Suchergebnisse auf &#8230; Copy und Paste via webpronews.com
Matt Cutts: Congrats to @bing on the launch! Sad to see this not-so-relevant result at #4 for [matt cutts] though: http://bit.ly/4a8Q1Y
Bing: @mattcutts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Eine interessante Conversation zwischen <a href="http://twitter.com/mattcutts">Matt Cutts</a> und einer Mitarbeiterin von <a href="http://twitter.com/bing">Bing.com auf Twitter</a>. Matt Cutts googled sich selber und zeigt in seinen Tweets spammige und unzureichende Suchergebnisse auf &#8230; Copy und Paste via <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/01/googles-matt-cutts-has-some-words-with-bing">webpronews.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> Congrats to @bing on the launch! Sad to see this not-so-relevant result at #4 for [matt cutts] though: <a href="http://bit.ly/4a8Q1Y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4a8Q1Y</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bing:</strong> @mattcutts anytime you want to give feedback to @bing, we&#8217;re here. <img src='http://www.ranking-news.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m sitting with the devs at present. ^betsy</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Betsy for Bing Bing:</strong> @mattcutts I know you are disappointed in ego search stuff tonight w/ @bing, but try &#8216;mtv movie awards 2009&#8242; and see what you get. <img src='http://www.ranking-news.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ^ba</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> Ouch. The #5 Bing result for [matt cutts] is spammy too: <a href="http://bit.ly/B2r5F" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/B2r5F</a> It&#8217;s a YouTube->WordPress autogenerated blog. <img src='http://www.ranking-news.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> @bing okay. First web result was from 2008 instead of 2009, even with 2009 in query: <a href="http://bit.ly/SToK1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/SToK1</a> . Google nails it.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> @bing but doesn&#8217;t it bother you that [mtv movie awards] on Google gives great news results and 2009 url, but w/Bing I only see 2008, 2007, ?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bing:</strong> @mattcutts Uh &#8211; the first answer folks see is the news answer, not what you circled. Apparently twilight won. ^ba</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> @bing by the way, Twilight did rock. I&#8217;m not ashamed to say it?glittery vampires rule!! <img src='http://www.ranking-news.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ranking-news.de/2009/06/matt-cutts-vs-bing-auf-twittercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
